In the following section the number in parentheses is the value assigned
to a factor. The factors and their assigned value are summarized in Table
1.
The internet software industry is still in the takeoff phase,- standard
platforms have not yet been established and new technologies are constantly
being developed. Thus technology is changing at a fast pace (1). The major
market for internet software is still the United States where 76 percent
of all internet users are located. The inflation rate in the U.S. is low
and has been relatively stable for a long time (5). With many companies
in the industry, strong market growth, and no established standards, demand
variability is fairly large (2). The price range of competing products
is very wide with some programs being distributed for free while other
similar programs are being sold at regular software prices (2). A combination
of lack of standards, low capital requirements for upstart companies, and
plenty of interested venture capitalists, means that barriers to entry
are low (2). Competitive pressure is more difficult to determine. Due to
the rapid market growth, competition is generally not very intensive despite
the great number of companies. However, in the more mature browser market
competition is fierce. Overall competitive pressure is increasing but the
industry has not begun to consolidate yet (4). Price elasticity of demand
is fairly elastic because customers can easily switch to a competitors
products (3). The average for ES value after subtracting 6 to get a negative
number that can be plotted in the coordinate system is -3.3.
With the market for internet software estimated to grow by 467 percent from 1995 to 2000 and the number of web users increasing by 1,589 percent in the same period, the growth potential (6) and the profit potential (5) is enormous for the companies in the industry. Financial stability (2) is relatively low in the industry - because the focus for most companies has been on market share rather than income it is uncertain how users will react to having to pay for software. In addition the technology is developing so fast that all companies face the risk of being leapfrogged by new technology from a competitor. That also means that technological know-how is a key success factor in the industry (5). Resource utilization is generally efficient because it is relatively easy to adapt capital investment in fixed assets to market share and revenue in the industry (4). Capital intensity (4) is currently not very high but is expected to increase markedly because of increasing R&D costs. It still easy to enter the industry since no clear market leaders have been established yet and because capital intensity is still low (2). Productivity and capacity utilization (2) is not very high - companies in the industry are growing very fast and are focusing more on expansion than efficiency. The average value for IS is 3.8.
Table 1: Industry Assessment.
Industry Assessment |
Industry |
1. Factors Determining Environmental Stability (ES) | |
Technological changes |
1 |
Rate of inflation |
5 |
Demand variability |
2 |
Price range of competing products |
2 |
Barriers to entry into market |
2 |
Competitive pressure |
4 |
Price elasticity of demand |
3 |
Average (-6): |
-3.3 |
2. Factors determining industry strength (IS) | |
Growth Potential |
6 |
Profit potential |
5 |
Financial stability |
2 |
Technological know-how |
5 |
Resource utilization |
4 |
Capital intensity |
4 |
Ease of entry into market |
2 |
Productivity, capacity utilization |
2 |
Average: |
3.8 |
In Table 2 the factors used for company assessment and the values that
have been assigned to each company are summarized.
Table 2: Company Assessment.
Company Assessment |
ADBE |
MSFT |
NSCP |
1. Factors determining competitive advantage (CA) | |||
Market share |
5 |
2 |
6 |
Product quality |
5 |
3 |
5 |
Product life cycle |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Product replacement cycle |
2 |
3 |
3 |
Customer loyalty |
5 |
4 |
5 |
Competition's capacity utilization |
2 |
5 |
3 |
Technological know-how |
5 |
5 |
6 |
Vertical integration |
4 |
6 |
4 |
Average (-6): |
-1.9 |
-1.9 |
-1.4 |
2. Factors determining financial strength (FS) | |||
Return on investment |
4 |
6 |
1 |
Leverage |
5 |
5 |
4 |
Liquidity |
5 |
6 |
4 |
Capital required/capital available |
5 |
5 |
3 |
Cash flow |
4 |
5 |
4 |
Ease of exit from market |
4 |
4 |
1 |
Risk involved in business |
2 |
4 |
1 |
Average: |
4.1 |
5 |
2.6 |
Adobe's exact market share in the web authoring and publishing software
segment of the industry is unknown, one of the main reasons being that
Adobe has distributed some of the company's programs (particularly the
Adobe Acrobat Reader) for free on the internet. But the company has some
of the most popular authoring and publishing programs such as Adobe FrameMaker,
Adobe PageMaker, and Adobe Photoshop. Adobe also has the advantage of being
industry leader in the 'regular' software market for publishing programs.
Thus Adobe's market share is estimated as being high (5) and their product
quality is also very high (5). The transition to electronic publishing
on the internet is still in an early stage and so the products that Adobe
makes can be considered to be early in their product life cycle (5). The
product replacement cycle is short (2) because technology is changing fast
and the company has to release new products often in order to remain competitive.
Adobe benefits from a rather high customer loyalty because of the high
standard of the company's products and because users are reluctant to switch
to a competitors products once the have learned how to use the tools from
Adobe (5). Capacity utilization varies in the industry. Among the smaller
competitors capacity utilization is high so these companies generally have
little capacity left for rapid expansion and investment in R&D. However
the bigger competitors, primarily Microsoft, have excess capacity which
poses a strong threat to Adobe (2). The technological know-how of the company
is very high (5). Adobe is established in all the major markets and has
a well-developed distribution system and the vertical integration may be
said to be fairly high (4). The average CA value for Adobe after subtracting
6 is -1.9.
Adobe is generally a financially strong and sound company (see Table
3). Return on revenue was 12.26% in 1995 which is acceptable although not
impressive in the software industry (4). The company has a solvency ratio
of 78.9% which is very high and the company's leverage must be said to
be well-balanced (5). The high solvency ratio also indicates a high degree
of liquidity and in fact the company has most of its assets in the form
of current assets. The current ratio is 3.7 which again is very high and
Adobes liquidity is therefore very good (5). In terms of capital required
vs. capital available the company should thus have enough capital available
for expansion (5). Adobe has a positive cash flow that has been increasing
in the past years (4). Financially market exit from the internet software
industry would be relatively easy for Adobe although it would be strategically
unwise (4). Since Adobe isn't very diversified the company has much at
risk in the business (2). The average FS value for Adobe is 4.1.
Table 3: Adobe Systems. Key financial figures. In USD millions.
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
|||
Total revenue |
$452,144 |
$520,031 |
$580,103 |
$675,617 |
$762,339 |
||
Net income | $78,725 |
$57,664 |
$42,007 |
$15,337 |
$93,485 |
||
Return on revenue | 17.41% |
11.09% |
7.24% |
2.27% |
12.26% |
||
Net income per share |
1.17 |
0.84 |
0.62 |
0.22 |
1.26 |
||
Total assets | $437,803 |
$525,849 |
$597,696 |
$710,000 |
$884,732 |
||
Shareholders' equity |
$358,755 |
$418,771 |
$457,216 |
$514,315 |
$698,417 |
Currently Microsoft's market share in the internet software industry
is low (2). When compared to Microsoft's main competitor, Netscape, the
product quality of Microsoft's internet programs is also rather low (3).
As is the case with the two other companies examined here, Microsoft's
products are in the early stage of their life cycle (5). Product replacement
occurs often in order to keep up with the competition (3). Microsoft hasn't
yet build up much customer loyalty for the company's internet programs
but it must be expected that Microsoft benefits somewhat from customer
loyalty for the company's other programs (4). Microsoft's competitors,
notably Netscape, generally have high capacity utilization and therefore
have limited capacity available for expansion (5). Microsoft has 4,000
software developers, a R&D budget of more than 1 billion dollars, and
has been industry leader for many years, and the company's technological
know-how is therefore high (5). The company has a vast marketing and distribution
network and is also involved with distribution and development of content
via the internet (through the Microsoft Network) and must thus be seen
as having a high degree of vertical integration (6). After subtracting
6 the average CA value for Microsoft is -1.9.
Microsoft has consistently managed to have a 25 percent net margin over the last five years and return on investment is very high (6). The company also has excellent leverage (5) and liquidity and Microsoft's shareholders have also authorized the issuance of up to 100 million shares of preferred stock so liquidity should not in any way be a problem for Microsoft (6). That means that the company has a good ratio of capital required vs. capital available (5). Microsoft maintains a positive cash flow and according to the annual report no problems are expecting in this area (5). Although Microsoft has invested heavily in internet software, the company is sufficiently diversified and has such a strong position generally in the software market that exit from the internet software market would not be financially impossible for Microsoft though it is unlikely for strategic reasons (4). Because Microsoft has a diversified product portfolio the financial risk involved for the company in the internet software industry is presently rather low, although, again for strategic reasons, the risk may be considered high (4). The average FS value for Microsoft is 5.
Netscape has a high market share in the web server software segment
and especially in the web browser segment of the internet software industry.
It is estimated that the company currently has between 65 and 80 percent
of the web browser market and Netscape may have achieved critical mass
in this segment which would put the company in a standard setting position
(6). The quality of the company's programs are high (5) and as is generally
the case in the industry the products are in an early stage of their life
cycle (5). Product replacement occurs often which is necessary if Netscape
wants to remain industry leader (3). The company has already build considerable
loyalty among its users (5) because of excellent products that are user-friendly
not to mention free! The capacity utilization of Netscape's main competitor,
Microsoft, is still relatively low which poses a threat to Netscape since
it means that Microsoft has capacity available for expansion (3). Netscape's
technological know-how is very high and its products are the most advanced
within the server/browser segment of the industry (6). Netscape has achieved
some degree of vertical integration in terms of international distribution
but not to the same extent as Microsoft (4). The average CA value for Netscape
after subtracting 6 is -1.4.
Netscape uses all revenue for expansion and R&D and as a consequence
has a negative income, and the return on investment is therefore negative
(1). Most of Netscape's capital needs for expansion have been financed
by issuing shares so the company isn't heavily indebted and leverage is
remains fairly well-balanced (4). With a current ratio of 3 the liquidity
is good (4). Capital available vs. capital required is low because the
company is expanding so fast and has try to keep up with Microsoft (3).
According to the 10Q management doesn't foresee any cash flow problems
during 1996 (4). Exit from the market would be very difficult for Netscape
since internet software is the company's main market (1). The risk involved
for Netscape is therefore greater since the company has a rather narrow
product portfolio (1). The average FS value for Netscape is 2.6.